LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Judy Holtzer Knopf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 5 Aug 1995 16:25:42 -0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Becky Hanson's posting was very scarey. Since the proponents of obstetric
ultrasound have stressed that it is sound waves, I have always assumed
that it operates on vibrations, not radiation. I am no scientist, rocket
or otherwise. I *am* very suspicious of obstetric U/S and waiting for
more research, meanwhile assuming that any damage done is the result of
the "sound waves" disturbing (ie vibrating) cells at the exact time of
replication, thus damaging them. The thought of "6 generations" of cells
being *mutated* is very upsetting, to say the least. Thus, I understood
that U/S treatment for milk stasis would "work" because of the breast
being "vibrated" with sound waves of high frequency, and be safe since
there was no major cell replication taking place.
 Could references be posted, please? Judy K. in Israel

ATOM RSS1 RSS2