LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Linda Palmer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 24 Mar 2007 01:12:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
While this paper seems to have gone further than others in considering 
statistical confounders and potential statistical glitches, the final 
conclusions still do not demonstrate the safety of customary bedsharing 
versus impromptu bed sharing. In think this is a very important 
differential. They did report that this difference was significant but do 
not take it out in the end. I'd like to see the overall risks of customary 
bedsharing (while the relation to breastfeeding here is likely less 
interesting).

In terms of the possibly slightly higher, but still very low, risk of 
bedsharing in the first months of life among breastfeeders, I'd like to 
see a measurement of their overall mortality. It was confirmed that 
breastfeeding duration was extended in bedsharers. If a few more are 
found dead in bed, is the overall death rate (at say 1 year) from all 
causes for bf bedsharers higher versus initially bf crib sleepers? or lower 
due to extended breastfeeding? (and it's certainly lower at one year 
versus "bottle-fed" crib sleepers0

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2