LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:30:45 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I am concerned that introducing formula now could theoretically increase 
the baby's susceptibility to the viral exposure it has already had. 
Since the NP didn't pick up on the blister, there won't be any antiviral 
meds in the mom for the present. Also to know: she's never been a real 
abundant supplier. I can't tell if Lawrence says it's OK for the baby to 
bf while the mom is on antivirals *because* of the meds concern or 
*because* of the viral concern (which concern is being put to rest?); 
plus, she doesn't address the "pump and dump" versus "feed EBrM from the 
affected breast" question, at least not in my edition.

Here are her three choices, as I see it--

(1) pump and dump from the affected breast, nurse on the unaffected 
breast, and introduce formula to make up the difference; or
(2) breastfeed the unaffected side and then feed the EBrM from the 
affected side; or
(3) let the baby be somewhat hungry for two or three days as her milk 
supply from the non-affected breast picks up.

Arly Helm, MS, IBCLC

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2