LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rachel Myr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Sep 2001 21:49:05 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Allergies are generally to proteins.  There is no milk protein in fat.  The
protein is in the non-fat portion of the milk, as is the carbohydrate.  It
sounds to me like allergy is a misnomer for the symptoms described.

The reason non-fat cow's milk is even more unsuitable for babies than whole
cow's milk, is that it is even higher in protein as was pointed out earlier
today.  It constitutes an inordinate load for the renal system, and can very
quickly dehydrate a small child because their obligatory fluid loss from
processing skim milk is so great.

Constipation is rife among small children who drink too much cow's milk.
Unless they are lactose-intolerant, in which case they have diarrhea.  Some
parents confuse the blurbs on the sides of milk cartons with official
governmental recommendations for diet, and this suits the dairy industry
just fine, but it doesn't suit much of anyone else.

Rachel Myr
Kristiansand, Norway

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2