I found it interesting how many people (all?) found flaws in the
methodology--and it wasn't only bf advocates! From editors to retired
doctors who have information about lead during the time period of the
study, everyone found a flaw.

I think it sounds like a safe assumption that this is one flawed study.

Gina
-- 
Gina Gerboth
719-562-0262
719-369-4368 (cell)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
La Leche League of Colorado/Wyoming
Health Care Professional Seminar:
The Science Behind the Timeless Art
October 19-20, 2007
Denver, Colorado
www.lllcoloradowyoming.org

On 9/6/07, Karleen Gribble <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Go to the website
> http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/bmj.38978.699583.55v1?hrss=1
> And read the rapid responses from Nina Berry and Alison Barrett who do a
> good job of explain just why this study is problematic in design.
> Karleen Gribble
> Australia
>
>              ***********************************************
>
> Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
> Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
> To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
> To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
> To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
> To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
>

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]