LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Margery Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Aug 1996 13:47:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Barbara, as usual you bring up a point worthy of lengthy
discussion!  I, personally, believe licensure is vital to our
survival as credible professionals. I know that there are folks
who know all too well the headaches licensure can bring (and
they should post their concerns here on Lactnet!). On the
other hand, in Massachusetts (where I practice) hairdressers
have to be licensed. The state requires that beauticians show
proof that they have met the standards set for their
profession. While this presents an extra layer of
bureaucracy, it also helps winnow out those who may not
meet locally established standards of practice. (And provides
an avenue to question the practice of individuals who may not
live up to the standard.)

However, those of us who see a potential benefit to licensure
must be careful to shepherd the creation of state standards.
In some areas there is strong support that LC license should
require RN as well.

Did IBLCE do a study or survey about this a few years back?
Seems like it was a lively subject at a past ILCA
conference...

Margery Wilson, IBCLC
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, MA  USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2