LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cathy Bargar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Mar 1999 18:35:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Jack says "But of course, the pharmaceutical companies tell us we need more
stuff." (for the flu)

Yeah, and they sell them to regular people who would probably be all the
better off for a couple of days in bed with tea, juice, aspirin, and a good
fat book. All advertised directly to consumers (who are then supposed to go
badger their doctors, I guess, since you can't just buy these drugs), mostly
for the sole purpose (I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT ELDERLY OR ILL PEOPLE WHOSE
HEALTH IS SERIOUSLY THREATENED BY THE FLU here, just us regular working
joes) of getting us back at our work stations faster, working for the gain
of those multinational corporations again.

Reminds me of issues Heather raised recently, with focusing on getting new
mothers back to work ASAP, rather than allowing for longer parenting
leaves...For whose good are these beneficences, anyway?

Cathy Bargar (Please, I'm neither underplaying the health threats to those
in compromised status posed by the flu, and heaven forfend, I'm not against
companies developing adequate BF policies. Just making an observation, which
I find not unrelated to some of the current rants.)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2