LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Dec 2000 10:15:04 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Diane:

 try to find the origional article from the Chicago Trib. they handled it
rather well. What the paper said was that the child was NOT removed because
he was nursing at 6, he was removed because mother was insisting on his
nursing and he indicated that he no longer wanted to. The judge was clear in
stating that the extended nursing was not the issue. the issue in quesition
was if this was under pressure from mom or the boys
desire.

  And undoubtedly there is a lot that we don't know.

   Patricia

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2