LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cathy Bargar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 May 1999 09:49:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (58 lines)
"how many actual
cases of parents rolling over on their babies are there?"

I agree with you, Teresa. If sleeping with your baby were so terribly
dangerous, how would most of us on the planet be around today? When I've
seen James McKenna speak, he shows a slide or a transparency that fills the
whole screen, blank except for one tiny little dot the size of a period down
in one corner, and says that this dot, relative to the whole blank screen,
represents the time in human history that human babies & parents have slept
apart. Humans evolve slowly, and while culture changes faster and faster,
human biology does not. How can it suddenly be, now in the latter portion of
this century in industrialized nations, that sleeping with our babies
represents a grave threat to their survival? I don't think so...

So whatever any given individual might think, here and now, about the merits
of co-sleeping, needs to be respected and addressed courteously. But
acknowledgement of their concerns does not mean that they are right in their
contentions.

Cathy Bargar RN IBCLC Ithaca NY


-----Original Message-----
From: T Pitman [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Sunday, May 09, 1999 9:21 PM
Subject: Re: co-sleeping article


I have read through the text of this article in Pediatrics and frankly, I
think it is appalling. The conclusions they came up with are simply not
supported by the content of the article.

Regarding the question of babies who were "overlaid" and died, I do wonder
if some of these babies are not deliberately smothered by abusive or
disturbed mothers. I work part-time for a local Children's Aid Society (CPS
in the U.S., I think) and I know of two cases where mothers had abused
babies previously and then reported a baby that died from "overlaying." In
one case, the mother's first baby was removed from her care after she broke
the baby's leg.

While the agency's workers were suspicious, the doctors who did the
autopsies said it is not possible to distinguish between a baby who has been
accidentally rolled on and a baby who has been deliberately smothered. With
not enough evidence to prove abuse, the deaths were classified as accidental
overlaying.

So once you subtract the parents who had been using alcohol or drugs, and
the ones who were deliberately abusing their children - how many actual
cases of parents rolling over on their babies are there?

Teresa Pitman

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2