Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 7 Mar 1998 21:45:27 -0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
WHO Code applies also to distributors, but not always in exactly the same
way. It covers the marketing of breastmilk substitutes (i.e. abm, anything
marketed as suitable for use as a partial or total replacement of breastmilk
, so early weaning foods are covered, and follow-on milks), feeding bottles,
teats(nipples). It also applies to the quality and availability, and to
information concerning their use.
You mention Walmart. I understand they have sold abm for many years, so
have had responsibilities as a distributor. BUT I hear they now have their
own-brand of abm - and that makes them a manufacturer. It doesn't matter
who is actually mixing up the stuff and putting it in cans - Walmart's name
is on the can, and they have manufacturer's responsibility.
I have a letter from WHO confirming that this is the case.
Not sure why anyone would be unable to comply with the Code if they so
wished.
I suspect you may be right in that the press has no obligations under the
Code - but the people who place the ads certainly do!
Mary Broadfoot, Paisley, Scotland
[log in to unmask]
The Breastfeeding Network - Independent Support and Information about
Breastfeeding http://webzone1.co.uk/www/cathus/bfnindex.htm
|
|
|