LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mary Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Mar 1998 21:45:27 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
WHO Code applies also to distributors, but not always in exactly the same
way.  It covers the marketing of breastmilk substitutes (i.e. abm, anything
marketed as suitable for use as a partial or total replacement of breastmilk
, so early weaning foods are covered, and follow-on milks), feeding bottles,
teats(nipples).  It also applies to the quality and availability, and to
information concerning their use.

You mention Walmart.  I understand they have sold abm for many years, so
have had responsibilities as a distributor.  BUT I hear they now have their
own-brand of abm - and that makes them a manufacturer.  It doesn't matter
who is actually mixing up the stuff and putting it in cans - Walmart's name
is on the can, and they have manufacturer's responsibility.

I have a letter from WHO confirming that this is the case.

Not sure why anyone would be unable to comply with the Code if they so
wished.

I suspect you may be right in that the press has no obligations under the
Code - but the people who place the ads certainly do!

Mary Broadfoot, Paisley, Scotland
[log in to unmask]
The Breastfeeding Network - Independent Support and Information about
Breastfeeding http://webzone1.co.uk/www/cathus/bfnindex.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2