LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kirkwood, Angela" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:08:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
If anyone would ever have the chance to observe a video fluoroscopic
swallow study, you will be glad you took the time to do so.  When an
infant, or someone of any age, aspirates, you actually SEE the liquid
going into the trachea as opposed to the esophagus.  You may also see
what is called PENETRATION.  Penetration is not aspiration but in some
cases, may progress to aspiration but not necessarily.  Penetration many
times does not require intervention unless it progresses to aspiration
further into the feeding.  The VFSS is an objective study, not
subjective.  What the study below states is that the VFSS is more
accurate than a clinical observatipn of symptoms such as cough, choke,
desaturation, wet or congestion audible and is better able to diagnose
and assist with finding most effective treatment.  Adjustments in
position, changing the flow of the liquid by various means should be
attempted to find an effective feeding plan considering the most benign
in risk.  When you slow that pace of feeding, starting with paced
swallows, slower flow, advancing texture etc... you SEE that the
aspiration is no longer occuring.  I am not sure what more evidence is
needed with that objective information.  The food needs to be kept out
of the lungs.  As I had mentioned in previous posts, there may be
situations that feeding at breast may be paced by mother when infant is
not selfpacing to maintain a safe airway.  There are situations that
thin liquids are just not safe and require a thickened texture and also
times that any feeding is not safe requiring no oral feedings.  I found
a nice site with evidence based info...  The multidiscipline approach is
very similar in my facility except for the pharyngeal swallow motility
study.  We do not have that ability.
http://www.nationwidechildrens.org/GD/Templates/Pages/MedPros/Profession
alPublications/PrinterFriendlyPage.aspx?page=5496&PageRefId=5492&Content
Id=41547 I have no idea if this link will go through to the list.
Angie Kirkwood RN BSN IBCLC RLC


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE. This e-mail and attachments (if any) are the sole property of Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise prohibited by law from disclosure or re-disclosure. This information is intended solely for the individual(s) or entity(ies) to whom this e-mail or attachments are addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, you are prohibited from using, copying, saving or disclosing this information to anyone else. Please destroy the message and any attachments immediately and notify the sender by return e-mail. Thank you. 



             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2