LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kathleen Bodden, RN, BScN, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Nov 1997 13:01:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Hi Lactnetters, and hopefully Jackie Glover, (author of paper
"Supplementation of Breastfeeding Newborns:  A Flow Chart for Decision
Making"  Journal of Human Lactation, June 1995, pages 127-131)

Our hospital is looking at appropriate reasons for supplementation,
reflecting BFHI's guidelines, and at a perinatal conference meeting, I was
caught off-guard when I was relating the stats for this study.  In 6 years
the supplementation rates fell from 82% to 44% because of their effort to
reduce supplementation.   A family doctor at this talk asked if the reduction
in postpartum hospital stays was calculated into this as this would probably
significantly squew the results.  On reading this paper, I don't see an
explanation of the postpartum stay lengths.   Can anyone help?

Kathy Bodden, RN, BScN, IBCLC in Toronto.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2