LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Mary Jozwiak IBCLC, RLC, BS" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Jul 2006 13:28:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (74 lines)
Esther, call me paranoid, but I am thinking this "Pro-Breastfeeding" 
campaign is more an attempt, (as is per usual as we approach World 
Breastfeeding Week and anti breastfeeding forces and ABM companies come 
out in force) to make breastfeeding proponants look like "fanatics" in 
order to discredit breastfeeding and those who advocate it. 

Several women in my LLL group, and a few of my clients saw these ads (I 
did not see them myself) and they said some of the people around them 
were "offended" by the content of them, and, in the way only 
antibreastfeeding people can, attempted to hold ALL breastfeeding women 
accountable for these "offensive" ads. *Perhaps THIS was the intent.* To 
use "PRObreastfeeding" messages, in the extreme as the new anti-
breastfeeding tactic. 

It wouldn't surprise me a bit. Just look at the news articles in July and 
early August in years gone by about breastfeeding, just as we are leading 
up to WBW......

Mary Jozwiak IBCLC, RLC
Private Practice



On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 06:25:59 +0200, EDG <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>
>Are they still considering breastfeeding as a lifestyle choice and not a
>health one?
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/opinion/02sun2.html?ex=1152504000
><http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/02/opinion/02sun2.html?ex=1152504000&amp;en=
>5100df4a0c7b4cf3&ei=5070&emc=eta1> &en=5100df4a0c7b4cf3&ei=5070&emc=eta1
>Editorial
>About Breast-Feeding ...
>Published: July 2, 2006
>If you want to start an argument, mention breast-feeding. A two-year
>federally sponsored campaign caused a rumpus when it compared a mother
>who fails to breast-feed with a pregnant woman who rides a bucking
>mechanical bull at a local tavern, or, in one official's formulation,
>with a woman who smokes while carrying a child. Recently, a Times
>article on the campaign incited a new debate that kept the report in the
>paper's most-e-mailed list for days. While we hesitate to stir things up
>again, it seems as if this is one issue where the middle ground makes
>the most sense.
>
>
>Esther G
>
>
>             ***********************************************
>
>To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
>To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
>To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
>All commands go to [log in to unmask]
>
>The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
>LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
>mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
>http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
>=========================================================================

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2