LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Alison K. Hazelbaker, MA, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Dec 1998 14:31:53 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
I don't understand how a long-time therapy for edema can be considered cutting
edge just because lactation consultant's have just recently begun to apply the
therapy to lactation practice. It was cutting edge 30 years ago or longer.
Now, it is just the obvious thing to do because we know so much more about
what engorgement is and what causes it.

There is nothing personal meant when a professional challenges the assumptions
of another professional with evidence. It is what, IMHO, we all should be
doing for each other and what a forum like this is all about.

As to always statements and never statements: I agree that getting stuck in
this rut is not productive but when a therapy is proven effective and another
is not we are not saying never do that therapy, just that it is unproven.
Maybe heat works in certain circumstances. Great! Is it proven for treatment
of edema. NO, it isn't. It is proven to be unhelpful and possibly harmful.

Alsion K. Hazelbaker

Alison K. Hazelbaker

ATOM RSS1 RSS2