LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nikki Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Oct 2003 09:10:40 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
In a message dated 9/30/03 8:30:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> it was rejected by both because it was considered unethical to withhold
> treatment
> that could alleviate nipple pain, thereby putting breastfeeding at risk.
>
>
Dear Friends:
     Please help me to understand this correctly. Teaching and helping
mothers to achieve correct latch was rejected for this study because it was
perceived as not alleviating nipple pain??? Whereas giving mothers products was the
ethical choice??
     Am I reading this correctly??
     warmly,
Nikki Lee RN, MS, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CIMI, CCE, craniosacral therapy
Adjunct faculty, Union Institute and University, Maternal and Child Health:
Lactation Consulting
Supporting the WHO Code and the Mother Friendly Childbirth Initiative

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2