LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wendy Blumfield <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:02:25 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (190 lines)
I got this from the health correspondent of the Jerusalem Post. Perhaps the next step is giving a tax break on formula!!
Wendy Blumfield
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Judy Siegel-Itzkovich 
Subject: NYTimes: Acne Cream? Tax-Sheltered. Breast Pump? No.


      October 26, 2010
      Acne Cream? Tax-Sheltered. Breast Pump? No.
      By DAVID KOCIENIEWSKI

      Denture wearers will get a tax break on the cost of adhesives to keep 
      their false teeth in place. So will acne sufferers who buy pimple 
      creams.

      People whose children have severe allergies might even be allowed the 
      break for replacing grass with artificial turf since it could be 
      considered a medical expense.

      But nursing mothers will not be allowed to use their tax-sheltered 
      health care accounts to pay for breast pumps and other supplies.

      That is because the Internal Revenue Service has ruled that breast- 
      feeding does not have enough health benefits to quality as a form of 
      medical care.

      With all the changes the health care overhaul will bring in the 
      coming years, it nonetheless will leave those regulations intact when 
      new rules for flexible spending accounts go into effect in January. 
      Those allow millions of Americans to set aside part of their pretax 
      earnings to pay for unreimbursed medical expenses.

      While breast-feeding supplies weren’t allowed under the old 
      regulations either, one major goal of the health care overhaul was to 
      control medical costs by encouraging preventive procedures like 
      immunizations and screenings.

      Despite a growing body of research indicating that the antibodies 
      passed from mother to child in breast milk could reduce disease among 
      infants — including one recent study that found it could prevent the 
      premature death of 900 babies a year — the I.R.S. has denied a 
      request from the American Academy of Pediatrics to reclassify breast- 
      feeding costs as a medical care expense.

      In some respects, the biggest roadblock for mothers’ groups and 
      advocates of breast-feeding is one of their central arguments: 
      nursing a child is beneficial because it is natural.

      I.R.S. officials say they consider breast milk a food that can 
      promote good health, the same way that eating citrus fruit can 
      prevent scurvy. But because the I.R.S. code considers nutrition a 
      necessity rather than a medical condition, the agency’s analysts view 
      the cost of breast pumps, bottles and pads as no more deserving of a 
      tax break than an orange juicer.

      Many mothers’ groups and medical experts say that breast milk 
      provides nutrition and natural supplements that prevent disease, and 
      would like to see its use expanded. Hospital accreditation groups 
      have been prodding maternity wards to encourage parents to feed only 
      breast milk until a child is 6 months old.

      The new health law does include one breakthrough for nursing mothers, 
      a mandate that they be permitted unpaid breaks to use breast pumps. 
      Spurned by tax authorities, breast-feeding advocates say they will 
      return to Congress to get a tax break, too.

      “There’s been a lot of progress in the past few years making the 
      public, the medical establishment and even Congress recognize the 
      health benefits of breast-feeding,” said Melissa Bonghi, a lactation 
      consultant in Bainbridge Island, Wash. “But I guess the I.R.S. will 
      just take a little longer.”

      With the new regulations set to take effect in two months, millions 
      of American workers now in the open enrollment period at their 
      employers have to determine whether, and how much, to set aside for 
      2011. More than 20 million people have flexible spending or other tax- 
      exempt health care savings accounts, and the programs are projected 
      to cost the federal Treasury about $3.8 billion this year and $68 
      billion over the next decade.

      The most far-reaching change involves over-the-counter medicines. 
      Since 2003, most of them have been eligible expenses, making flexible 
      spending accounts so popular that some plans issued debit cards that 
      allowed users to make purchases without having to file for 
      reimbursement later.

      As of Jan. 1, however, over-the-counter medications — including 
      allergy remedies, cough suppressants or even pain relievers like 
      aspirin or ibuprofen — will be eligible only if they are prescribed 
      by a doctor. That change is so drastic that the National Association 
      of Chain Drug Stores, which represents 37,000 pharmacies, last week 
      asked the I.R.S. for a two-year delay in that regulation, to allow 
      merchants to recalibrate the computer systems that determine which 
      products are eligible for purchase with flexible spending account 
      debit cards.

      Many factors, including the length of maternity leave, affect how 
      long a woman breast-feeds.

      According to a survey by the Centers for Disease Control and 
      Prevention, about 75 percent of the 4.3 million mothers who gave 
      birth in 2007 started breast-feeding. By the time the baby was 6 
      months old, the portion dropped to 43 percent, and on the child’s 
      first birthday, to 22 percent.

      A study released this year by Harvard Medical School concluded that 
      if 90 percent of mothers followed the standard medical advice of 
      feeding infants only breast milk for their first six months, the 
      United States could save $13 billion a year in health care costs and 
      prevent the premature deaths of 900 infants each year from 
      respiratory illness and other infections.

      “The old adage that breast-feeding is a child’s first immunization 
      really is true,” said Dr. Robert W. Block, president-elect of the 
      American Academy of Pediatrics. “So we need to do everything we can 
      to remove the barriers that make it difficult.”

      To continue breast-feeding once they return to work, many mothers 
      need to use pumps to extract milk, which can be chilled and bottle- 
      fed to the child later. The cost of buying or renting a breast pump 
      and the various accessories needed to store milk runs about $500 to 
      $1,000 for most mothers over the course of a year, according to the 
      United States Breastfeeding Committee, a nonprofit advocacy group. 
      Lactation consultants, who can cost several hundred dollars, also 
      would not be an eligible expense.

      Roy Ramthun, a former Treasury Department official, said that tax 
      officials’ reluctance to classify those costs as medical expenses 
      stemmed from a fear that the program might be abused.

      “They get very uneasy about anything that smacks of food because they 
      fear it will open up all sorts of exceptions,” said Mr. Ramthun, who 
      runs a consulting company that specializes in health savings 
      accounts. “It’s a matter of cost and of protecting the integrity of 
      the tax code.”

      Bills introduced last year by Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, 
      Democrat of New York, and Senator Jeff Merkley, Democrat of Oregon, 
      would have allowed nursing mothers to claim the tax break. But breast- 
      feeding advocates say that effort, like many before, was undone by 
      economic and cultural factors.

      “Everyone says they support breast-feeding, but getting businesses 
      and Congress to act on it has been surprisingly difficult,” said 
      Barbara Emanuel, executive director of the breast-feeding advocacy 
      group La Leche League International. “We get resistance from the 
      formula companies and cultural resistance, so it can be hard to get 
      nursing mothers the support that everyone agrees they deserve.”

      Unless the law changes, some mothers may ask their pediatricians for 
      a note that breast-feeding is medically necessary. Jody L. Dietel, 
      who works for a company that processes claims from flexible spending 
      accounts, says that many patients who receive orthodontic procedures 
      have used such a tactic.

      “Orthodontia is really so you have nice, straight teeth,” said Ms. 
      Dietel, chief compliance officer for WageWorks. “But the doctors 
      write notes warning that the patient’s jaw might be damaged without 
      treatment or their overbite could cause health problems, and it 
      becomes an eligible expense. For breast-feeding there are two 
      components, too: nutritional and preventative medicine.”

      Judy Siegel-Itzkovich
      The Jerusalem Post's Health & Science Reporter




     

           
     



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intelligent Mail ™ Powered by [log in to unmask] 
Please do not enrich emails sent to me. 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2