LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rachael Hamlet <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 26 Jul 1995 00:44:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Thought I could post to Parent-L & Lactnet with one msg.  Apparently not.
---------------------
Forwarded message:
From:   [log in to unmask]
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Reply-to:       [log in to unmask]
To:     [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Date: 95-07-25 21:43:41 EDT

I just saw something in my local supermarket that made me wildly angry.
 Right on the front of a large bottle of White House brand apple juice was a
drawing of a baby bottle with words to the effect of "Good for Babies, Too."
 This is not only a blatent violation of the WHO code (which doesn't have the
force of law in the US anyway), but I think it must violate some FDA or FTC
regulation.  The only foods approved for the use of very young babies, at
least, are breastmilk and formula.  I can't believe they are permitted to
advertise apple juice as "Good for Babies."

Can you see the steam coming out of my ears?  Tomorrow, I am going back to
the supermarket, when I am calmer, and talk to the manager, get the address
of the manufacturer, and find out what the state and federal agencies have to
say.  Is there anyone out there who knows exactly which authorities I should
be contacting?  I should mention that I live in Northern Virginia, in the
Washington, DC suburbs, so contacting the Feds directly is only a local call
away for me.

Rachael Hamlet
Angry Radical BF Lawyer Mom from Hell

ATOM RSS1 RSS2