Sarah writes (regarding that "little bit of formula" study)"
 

<<The criterion was 5% weight loss *in the first 36 hours*,  not all babies 
with 5% weight loss. The authors picked this particular  criterion because 
previous research showed this sort of more rapid weight loss  to be a 
predictor of a higher likelihood of going on to further weight  loss>>
 
Can I beg and plead for someone to actually do a study on the amount of  
weight loss in percentages in babies and the comparison to amount of fluids 
and  pitocin mom has received and how much baby is losing by WEIGHING DIAPERS? 
  When we see a percentage of weight loss, is ANYONE looking at how much 
the baby  peed & pooped in the first 24-36 hours?  And not just checking off 
the  pees and poops, but actually doing some *real* output measurements?  We  
know the more IVs the mom gets, the more the baby loses.  But we jump all  
over percentages -- to the point that some moms aren't told what the baby's  
weight is, just that "he is down 7%".  
 
The assumption is -- as was in this study -- that a certain percent weight  
loss is due to inadequate breastfeeding.  And in fact, it might be.   But 
before we make those assumptions, lets see what the baby's output  is.....
 
Jan Barger, RN, MA, IBCLC, FILCA
Lactation Education  Consultants
Wheaton IL

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome