LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joyce Blangiardo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Mar 1996 23:18:47 UT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Regarding pre and post-feed weighing and Nancy's thoughts on whether women can
yield high fat letdowns under the stress of knowing their output is going to
be measured...Its sort of like suggesting a study where the amount of
ejaculate would be measured after sex; one wonders if the average male
wouldn't have some performance anxiety that would interfere with the quality
of the experience.  Oh, my, am I getting too weird, folks?  I think Nancy's
point may be well taken.

I recall touring a Vermont dairy farm a few years ago.  The farmer stressed
repeatedly that "nervous high-strung cows" give more milk...He didn't discuss
the fat content of their milk though and I didn't ask that, or what criteria
he used to evaluate their personality traits.
I returned from that trip with a T shirt reading "10,000 cows can't be wrong".
 It referred to living in Vermont, of course, but I chose to believe it meant
that cows breastfeed their young, and obviously know that's best...reading
some recent posts on cow calfs and bottles, I guess the cows may know what's
best for their babies, but apparently the farmers disagree.

Joyce Blangiardo RN, FACCE, IBCLC, in sunny NY where the crocus are coming up!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2