LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rachel Myr <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:40:03 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (47 lines)
OK, here goes, the cynic in me is coming out.  How was this new strategy
decided?
Marsha, do you know whether focus groups have been used to explore the
effect of emphasizing exclusive BF for 6 months in a society without
universal maternity leave?  This sounds like it could backfire, and turn
into another stick to beat women with, in the words of Maureen Minchin.

Also, depending on how the importance of exclusive BF is presented, it could
play right into the hands of Brand X: 'In order to get the benefits of BF,
you should give your baby nothing else for the first 6 months...'  So
industry can follow up with a subtle or not-so-subtle message that 'if you
won't be able to BF exclusively for 6 months, you can just as well start
formula from day one.'  Do we have any guarantee that this new emphasis was
not approved by the industry before it was chosen?

It also reinforces social differences because whether we like it or not,
there are social differences in US women's choice fields for where they
spend the first six months of their children's lives. Given the current
state of the economy, women are unlikely to quit a job because the chances
of finding a new one after the 6 months of exclusive BF aren't that great.

It will be much easier for industry to paint artificial feeding as the
'convenient' alternative, allowing women 'freedom' while breastfeeding keeps
them 'tied to the baby' for six months.  I am putting these words in quotes
to show they are not my opinion, but speculation on how someone trying
desperately to hold on to their market share might present it.

To me it sounds as though the entire slant of the campaign has been changed,
in a direction that suits commercial interests much better than the original
one did.  I guess I shouldn't be surprised, or shocked, but for the moment I
am at least disappointed.

Rachel Myr
feeling like a huge wet blanket in Kristiansand, Norway

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2