LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Green <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 2 Jan 1999 10:20:56 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
In a message dated 12/31/98 7:53:34 PM Central Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< Now you know why it's done - the stakes are very high.

 An orally defensive baby - I had two particularly difficult ones this month
 - is going to do better on breastfeeding in my nursery with LC help than if
 he were intubated and on a ventilator in the NICU for a week. >>

From a medical standpoint, it is better to have a live & "healthy" baby who is
orally defensive than a sick, intubated baby who does not have the "chance" to
be orally defensive, if you know what I mean.  That is one reason why I have a
hard time seriously accepting some of the "psycho-trauma" stuff due to
suctioning.  Another reason is that when I think about all the "trauma" that
an infant suffers from being born (albeit natural), it is really hard to
seriously accept that properly-done suctioning of an infant's naso-
oropharyngeal space, airway and stomach for "real" medical reasons is somehow
going to cause some sort of weird psycho-oro-mental-cognitive anguish.  Being
born, however natural, is much more traumatic than having your nose "snogged."
IMHO
Andrew MD
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2