LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nina Berry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:06:07 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
"So -- when a bottle works LESS like a breast or MORE like a breast - we
can't discuss that aspect either?'
My answer would be, 'Show me the evidence.'  I do not believe, for even an
instant that any bottle works any more like a breast than any other.  If
there is evidence, perhaps from an ultrasound study that measured the
pressures in infants' mouths, show me. 
The claim that one bottle works more like a breast than others is a
marketing claim designed to convince mothers and breastfeeding professionals
to prefer one brand over another.  It is a device used to position a teat as
the next best thing to a mothers' breast.  There is no evidence that I am
aware of to support this sort of claim and IBCLCs have no place perpetuating
such a myth.
There may be reasons to choose one teat over others (and I can see no
problem with discussing those).  However, those reasons will not include
'because it is more like a breast' (because that is a marketing claim).
Cheers
Nina Berry
Australia

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2