LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glenn Evans <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 May 1997 20:45:50 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
  Below is my letter regarding TIMES ongoing underwhelming support of =
breastfeeding.

Gentlemen:  I cannot believe that your magazine, which has such a =
world-wide distribution,  has so poorly represented breastfeeding in =
your recent articles.     In your articles on healthy children, brain =
growth, etc., you do not mention breastfeeding as a major contribution =
to both.  Thus, by indirection, you do your readers and breastfeeding a =
disservice, allowing the inference that what the baby eats and how it is =
fed is of little consequence.  Your picture of a bottle with your =
Parenttime column implies support of bottlefeeding as the first choice =
for nutrition. =20

 Around the world, countries are pushing to improve their breastfeeding =
rates as the first and biggest step to improving quality of life for =
their infants and children. I think you owe it to your readers =
world-wide, to produce an extensive coverage presenting breastfeeding in =
its best lights.  Of course, some mothers/babies will not or cannot =
breastfeed.  That is sad, whatever, the reason.  But it does not negate =
the importance and efficacy of breastfeeding as the first choice for =
feeding our world's children.

Sincerely,  Chanita Stillerman, mother, concerned citizen, LC and RN
227 Bennington Street, San Francisco, CA 94110 --- (415) 647-3361


ATOM RSS1 RSS2