LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jo-Anne Elder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:22:29 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
Henya wrote,
> The shepards were saying that
> most of the exclusively bottle fed animals will have severe behavioral
> problems , and as they grow become unmanageable.
Mmm... I was thinking that my bf kids were unmanageable, but you're 
reminding me that we've been raising generations of kids who haven't 
been showing normal behavioural patterns, and some of them are adults 
who are not able to judge what is normal because they haven't respected 
physiological norms. So what we consider problems might not be the same 
if we were considering child-centred, breastfed, ap populations. If mine 
are any indication, creative, questioning, active, self-aware and 
sensitive kids may just be the biological norm. I'll have to remember to 
look at it this way. (It was helpful when they were toddlers for my 
husband and me to remind ourselves that this was age-appropriate behaviour.)
Actually, ever since I read K, Dettwyler, J. Newman etc. I have been 
aware of how much we do to make children conform to the expectations of 
our particular society. The relationship between the ability to space 
feedings with formula and the economic advantage of spacing work breaks 
in industrialized workplaces was an eye-opener. Putting aside personal 
needs like eating and going to the bathroom are certainly extensions of 
this expectation in the classroom. Right now my pet peeve is the belief 
that schools and other institutions have to train children for the 
workplace, not in terms of providing them with coping skills but in 
terms of conforming to an external discipline. A school here has just 
banned sweat pants in a high school because they are unprofessional. A 
very clever (bf?) young woman who was interviewed reminded us that not 
all jobs required suits, and that anyway, "we're kids!" Good point! To 
me, child-led (or even child-sensitive) weaning which enables our 
children to be physically close to us as long as they need to be seems 
to be related to giving children permission to be kids *and* giving 
adults permission to have non-traditional work/family/life-paths rather 
than putting their "personal" (family) needs aside in their search for 
non-unionized, white colour, low-wage employment in which the boss tells 
you whether you look and act professional enough. Remember, this is the 
expectation that most of the mothers we work with grew up with. We need 
to support her inclination to follow her best and truest self and her 
most deeply-rooted instincts in the face of these unhealthy expectations..
Jo-Anne (who took her conference call in her pyjamas this morning, and 
is now wearing stretchy pants and a ripped t-shirt. Oversharing? No! I'm 
making a point!)

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2