LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James O'Quinn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 Apr 2006 09:01:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Heather,
Thanks for the input...
I question the 10 oz weight gain between day 3 and day 6 also...
The baby was weighed with the same instrument at birth, and on day 3  
by the midwife who attended the birth...
the baby was naked for those weights...the scale was one which  
suspends the baby in a sling...

The day 6 weight was recorded with a digital scale at a  
pediatrician's office- baby was clothed and in a diaper...
I weighed the baby clothed and in a diaper so I would be comparing  
apples to apples when comparing the day 6 weighing
with yesterday's weighing...and the baby has lost weight over the 12  
day interval...

The latch and suck look picture perfect, but the mom is going to pump  
between nursings to rule out poor milk transfer

thanks again,
Jen O'Quinn

On Apr 30, 2006, at 5:20 AM, heather wrote:

>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> I've been reading the archives but would like to post this  
>> situation anyway...
>>
>> Helping a second time mom with 18 day old baby.
>> Baby weighed 7 lbs 14 oz at birth born at home- no complications...
>> Lowest recorded weight was 7 lbs 5 oz on day 3.
>> Highest recorded weight was 7 lbs 15 oz (mom recalls this as being  
>> on day 6).
>> Today baby weighed 7 lbs 11 oz.
>
>
> I would question the accuracy of those weighings. A baby does not  
> normally gain 10  oz between  day 3 and day 6....either the  
> mother's recall of the timing, or the weights, is incorrect, I  
> would say. Are there no written records of these?  This sort of  
> thing should not rely on mother's recall.
>
> How was the baby weighed? Electronic scales with recent  
> calibration? Or some other way? Naked? Or clothed? At the same time  
> of day and in the same relation to feeding or not? Who weighed the  
> baby?
>
> I can't comment on whether this mother sounds as if she has  
> insufficient 'raw  material'  to  make milk, but most women as we  
> know can make more than enough milk for at least two babies,  
> especially at first,  if they're given a baby/babies who suck  
> effectively and often.
>
> I would be looking at improving the way the baby attaches to the  
> breast to improve this effectiveness, plus suggesting breast  
> compression to encurage the baby to continue feeding when he stops  
> sucking.
>
> But mostly,  I'd be sceptical  of those weights....and I'd ask  
> about the accuracy of the birthweight, too.
>
> Heather Welford Neil
> NCT bfc, tutor, UK
>
>             ***********************************************
>
> To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
> To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
> To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
> All commands go to [log in to unmask]
>
> The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
> LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
> mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
> http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
>

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2