LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James O'Quinn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 16 Jul 2005 12:40:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (133 lines)
Marsha, Kathy, and Jan and anyone else following this thread :-)

It seems perfectly plausible that IV fluids and drugs with an 
antidiuretic action could lead to bloated babies, but I have noticed 
that term babies of moms who have natural childbirth are bloated as 
well...my understanding is that it is normal (in the non-induction 
situation) for the mom becomes bloated as a protection against low bp 
in advance of labor and she quickly sheds these fluids after birth, and 
I think the same thing is happening to the baby...he is shedding these 
extra fluids in the hours immediately following birth....

My experience with babies leads me to believe that weight loss of 7-10% 
(may be even more in super bloated babies?) is to be expected 
especially if the mother is not experiencing early lactogenesis 
II...but at the other end of that, the expectation that babies should 
be returning to birth weight by 14 days is way off base in my 
opinion...with good breastfeeding management ( no other problems beyond 
the mothers control) l I see babies returning to, and exceeding birth 
weight between day 5-7, depending on parity and nursing experience 
during pregnancy...

The reason I would like to nail down what is actually normal for each 
type of birth, primiparas, multiparas, and multiparas who nursed 
through a pregnancy, is that in my estimation the pediatricians and 
moms are waiting too long when there are breastfeeding problems to seek 
  help...in my area they typically decide there is a weight gain issue 
when the baby hasn't regained birth weight at the two week mark...

If we could establish a more accurate bench mark for regaining and 
exceeding birth weight, for each type of mother, perhaps the timing of 
newborn checks could be altered to optimize the timing of interventions 
that would salvage the breastfeeding relationship...

Another thread is exploring the reasons mothers wean and my experience 
has been that the primary reason mothers wean is a general feeling of 
dissatisfaction with breastfeeding...a general dissatisfaction that 
moms can't usually pin down...my intuition is that in many instances 
this dissatisfaction arises from a less than copious milk supply,  or 
the perception that frequent nursing means the supply is inadequate...I 
guess what I'm trying to say is that when the milk supply is copious 
AND the mother perceives it to be so, she is more inclined to work 
through other obstacles that may arise to breastfeeding (working, sore 
nipples etc)... but if the supply isn't great she weans or will wean at 
the next bump in the road...

Jen O'Quinn IBCLC


On Jul 16, 2005, at 9:22 AM, [log in to unmask] wrote:

>
>
> Marsha  says:
>
> <<I know  it hasn't been proven that babies of moms who have retained 
> a lot of
> water  could be overloaded themselves, so let me pose this question.  
> How  do
> you explain babies who are feeding ok, though not great, and sometimes 
>  not
> even ok, who pee and poop like there's no tomorrow for the first 1-2  
> days?>>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
>
> 1. There actually was a  very small study that was reported in the ABM
> newsletter awhile back that showed  that mothers that had epidurals 
> (by extension,
> more fluids) had babies that  weighed more (and lost more) than 
> mothers that
> did not have epidurals.   (Merry, ABM News, 2000)
>
> 2.  Pitocin is an  antidiuretic (look it up in the PDR).  As such, it 
> holds
> fluids in the  mother's body (one of the reasons Jean "invented" RPS). 
>  It is
> also going  to work the same way on the baby if the mother got pit 
> while the
> baby was in  utero!!  i.e. -- stimulated or induced.
>
> 3.  It would be  helpful if every diaper that comes off the baby w/ 
> something
> in it were weighed,  and then compared the weights of whatever is 
> eliminated
> in the first 2 days by  induced/epidural/high volume fluid mothers to 
> weights
> of the diapers of babies  who were born to mothers that didn't have
> induction/epidurals/high volume  fluid.
>
> Can't do it at my  hospital because we will have all former and no 
> latter.
> Unless we could do  a cut off point -- anyone that had the
> induction/stimulation/epidural for 3  hours or less, or 2 liters of 
> fluid or less BEFORE the baby
> was born, compared  to the mothers that had 
> induction/stimulation/epidural for
> more than 3 hours or  more than 2 liters of fluid.
>
> Any  takers?
>
> Jan Barger
> Wheaton IL
>
> _http://motherofbridebyJan.blogspot.com_
> (http://motherofbridebyjan.blogspot.com/)
>
>              ***********************************************
>
> To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
> To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
> To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
> All commands go to [log in to unmask]
>
> The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
> LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
> mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
> http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
>

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2