LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Heleen Hayes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:29:05 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (57 lines)
Part of the problem is that the people who disagree with Marianne and mee, feel that they 
have breastfeeding on the top of their list. They feel a modern breastfeeding mom cannot do 
without a pump and bottles.  They say that marketing bottles by a pump-manufacturer is 
breastfeeding friendly. They feel that bottles are these days associated with breastfeeding 
(are they really??????) 
In short: they think they comply with the spirit of the code, and we disagree...

Heleen
of the Dutch IBFAN group

On 22 Nov 2009 at 8:02, Elizabeth Brooks wrote:

> Marianne, the WHO Code is "merely" a model.
> 
> You can look to the introduction and the preamble of the WHO Code, and
> find language that is strongly pro-BF, and very broad, so that one can
> interpret it many ways. If you dig a little into the legislative
> history of the document, you will find it was created after a LOT of
> battling, and very intense lobbying by the formula manufacturers.  So
> it is by no means a perfect document.  Even if it was, just having
> words on paper somewhere would not enable you -- or anyone -- to go
> "Aha!  See!  It's right there! You have to agree with me and do it my
> way!" The only way the WHO Code has potency is if it is enacted into
> law, in a country that is willing to provide enforcement powers to
> back it up.
> 
> Now -- if you are an effective lobbyist, you can STILL try to
> *persuade* people to agree with your interpretation, because you can
> point to that strong pro-BF language in the Code, and say "Aha!  See! 
> It's right there! That supports my argument that the Code protects the
> process of BF ...[or whatever]."
> 
> -- 
> Liz Brooks JD IBCLC
> Wyndmoor, PA, USA
> 
>              ***********************************************
> 
> Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
> To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
> Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
> COMMANDS: 1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body
> of an email: set lactnet nomail 2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
> 3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet 4. To get a comprehensive list
> of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2