Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 18 Nov 1999 23:33:57 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Elisheva Urbas wrote:
>Whoa! I don't think anybody is saying to bottlefeed JUST because it is
>their right not to. Rather they are saying that, in their considered
>opinion of their own lives, they actually do have lots and lots of reasons to
>bottle feed, and that our assertions of the health benefits do not persuade
>them that we appropriately understand their cost-benefit calculus in their
>own lives
I know. and to me, this clearly indicated they are *not* taking the health
issue seriously and they do *not* believe there is a significant worth
mentioning difference in breast and bottle feeding. Beyond how the formula
can says "Breast is Best." I do not believe *anyone* who *truly*
understood and completely believed the risks of formula feeding would
choose to bottlefeed when there was nothing other than social reasons
holding them back. I don't mean to make light of social reasons, it's just
again, if breastfeeding were seen as the bare *minimum* instead of the
"wonderful over and above sacrificing mother" trip social reasons wouldn't
be considered a valid reason to deny a child these serious health benefits.
-Wendey (studying LC, Breastfeeding Peer Support Counsellor)
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|