Content-Type: |
text/plain; boundary="QdGFAPeCNPdHSMEedBcXKFHCFPVFGc";
charset="iso-8859-1" |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 18 May 1999 23:55:08 -0400 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I can chime in that allowing breastfeeding "with the appropriate discretion"
is about as vague a legal standard as I could think of. Arguably the bill
means if a customer or shop keeper or anyone else feels a woman is nursing
without "appropriate discretion," she may be asked to leave. That is the
most plausible reading of the bill. Who determines what "appropriate
discretion" is? A judge? A jury? Another customer? Anyone who witnesses
the nursing couple?
The language of the bill is ridiculous -- if it is ever used against a
woman, I would hope the legislature would then take the opportunity to
delete the reference to "appropriate discretion." The stuff about giving
out breastfeeding information to all pregnant woman sounds very positive --
I guess they had to appease some senators by including the discretion
clause.
Rhonda Feder
Elkins Park, PA
lawyer, lay counselor in training
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|