LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Jan 1999 12:13:46 -0500
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
Cathy Bargar <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
cc: Dressler-DeMarco <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Diane LLLL in Vermont writes:
"Cathy, you talk about LLL as having a strong philosophical/ideological
position that alienates, but I wonder if people are really looking at
and considering that position.I bet there aren't all that many on
Lactnet who would disagree much with any of those ten LLL concepts."

Exactly right, BUT (at least in the context of our current discussion) that
isn't what's at issue. What I am saying is that it's "other people's"
PERCEPTION of LLL that sustains the misgivings and the feelings of
alienation, that makes women say that they're leery of contacting a
LLLL,etc. See the difference? And, to a certain point, it doesn't matter if
the perception is incorrect, because it's that inaccurate perception we're
dealing with, not the real facts.

Cathy Bargar, still NOT BASHING! HONEST!!

ATOM RSS1 RSS2