Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Apr 1999 08:25:10 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
this was a question I posted a week or so ago. I understand that the table
that I wrote from the "Pediatrics Basics" publication, etitled Iron Deficiency
and Anemia didn't print very well. I'm going to type it a little different in
hopes that you can read it better.
Iron Absorption by Infants Fed Formula or Milk reference: US Dept. of Health
and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations to prevent
and control iron deficiency in the United States. MMWR 47(RR-3):1-36,1998.
nonfortifed formula's iron content is 1.5-4.8 mg/L the iron is ~10 %
bioavailable and the iron absorbed is 0.15-0.48 mg/L
iron-fortified formula's iron content is 10.0 - 12.8mg/L the iron is ~4%
bioavailable and the iron absorbed is 0.40-0.51
whole cow's milk iron content is 0.5 mg/L the iron is ~10 % bioavailable and
the iron absorbed is 0.05mg/L
breast milk's iron content is 0.5mg/L the iron is ~50% bioavailable and the
iron absorbed is 0.25mg/L
The article goes on to say that "Different infant diets are associated with
varying risks for developing iron deficiency. Infants consuming whole cow's
milk/non-fortified formula have a 30-40% risk, infants exclusively breastfed
have a 20% risk, and those consuming iron-fortifed formulas have only an 8%
risk.
Do you think that this is the study or article that the Nutrition Committee is
basing their recomendations on?
Camille Foretich, Jackson, Mississippi
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|