LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Janice Berry <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jan 1999 11:09:34 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
I notice this was first published February 1998 in Portland Parent. I was
fortunate enough to have missed it then. :-P

http://www.nwparent.com/scripts/Northwest/paper/Article.asp?ArticleID=451

This sidebar was my "favorite" part:

Mother’s Milk Is Best, but Formula Is Not All Bad
• Breast-fed babies get fewer ear infections than bottle-fed babies do, but
according to one recent study reported in a pediatrics journal, 80 percent
of ear obstructions in bottle-fed babies can be resolved by changing babies’
feeding positions. Therefore, the idea that breast-feeding itself prevents
ear infections may be overrated.
• Breast-feeding and pumping mothers are more likely to be fatigued than
mothers who are feeding their infants formula. In 1995, Jane Brody of the
New York Times wrote of a survey in which mothers reported higher energy,
better moods, and increased sexual interest after discontinuing nursing.
• In general, studies indicate that formula-fed babies gain more weight than
breast-fed infants. Some pediatricians recommend supplementation with
formula for low-weight babies.
• Most infants thrive whether fed formula or breast milk. A study reported
in the New York Times in 1994 suggests that, even though serious bacterial
infections (those requiring hospitalization) occur 10 times more frequently
in formula-fed infants than in their breast-fed counterparts, such
infections are rare in both groups.

Janice Berry
Columbus, OH

ATOM RSS1 RSS2