LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Nov 1998 09:28:22 -0500
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
"Linda J. Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Heather <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Heather, I have to disagree with you here. Non-nutritive suck does little to
stimulate or even maintain a milk supply. Stimulation is part of the system,
and removal of milk plays a bigger role. A baby who consistently feeds for
45 minutes or more may have a sucking problem. If this baby is not removing
milk, supply will DECREASE. In these situations, pumping may be needed to
keep supply up while the suck problem is being investigated and resolved.

If there is a question about milk supply, mom should NOT be using hormonal
contraceptives, period.

Linda J. Smith, BSE, FACCE, IBCLC
Bright Future Lactation Resource Centre
Dayton, OH USA
http://www.bflrc.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2