Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 1998 19:07:05 +0000 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Comments: |
|
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Very interesting, Alison - I hadn't realised the term non-nutritive sucking
came originally from bottle feeding/pacifier research, in fact I had only
ever come across the term in US-based info, and I always translated it into
our UK term 'comfort sucking' . However, I have always been slightly
uncomfortable, knowing it can't be an exact translation - here, we think
of comfort sucking as delivering 'less' nutrition, but not 'none'.
I have written before about how mad I get - internally , as you'd never
know it from my calm face and relaxed body language : ) - when I hear the
term 'just sucking for comfort' - what do you mean, 'just' I want to ask!
Your post reminded me of how (in the UK at any rate) mothers were told to
feed '10 minutes a side every four hours' based on what bottle feeding
babies had been observed to do...
Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc Newcastle upon Tyne UK
|
|
|