LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Why no statement against _Babywise_?
From:
Digest Katie Allison Granju <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Jul 1998 19:25:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
As some of you know, I am working on an article about _Babywise_ for a
magazine. As it has become increasingly clear that no recognized expert
is willing to speak in favor of the "infant management system" advocated
in _Babywise I and II_, and many have spoken against, I am curious why
major medical and lactation science organizations have not formally
taken a stand against the books.

Opinions from medical professionals?

Katie Allison Granju
Knoxville, TN

ATOM RSS1 RSS2