LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 May 1998 07:22:39 +0000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Comments:
cc: LaverneFN <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
There is no need for the mother's milk to be tested for sodium.  The
mother should breastfeed, because it is best for her and her baby.
What a bunch of pseudo scientific claptrap to suggest that if the
sodium in the milk is 40 meq/l, say, the mother should not breastfeed.
When are they going to measure?  Colostrum has higher sodium.  If she
is not producing because of the stress of waiting for a result, the
milk sodium could be artificially high.  Even if a true value of the
sodium were 40 meq/l, why on earth would a baby be better on
artificial feedings?  Lots of babies around the world were fed on
plain cow's milk with a sodium of 55 meq/l and still did fine (unless
they developed gastroenteritis).

Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2