LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 May 1998 08:18:35 +0000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Comments:
cc: Denise Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I still think it better to give the vitamin K intramuscularly.  I have
not heard of breast refusal after oral vitamin K, but we do not use
oral vitamin K here in Toronto.  They do in Halifax (Canada), but I
doubt they have more breast refusal than we do.

The question of IM vitamin K and leukemia is a red herring, unproved,
and really unlikely as far as I am concerned.

I have seen a baby bleed into his head, and it is terrible.  A baby
born after a midwife delivery at home, non traumatic.  Parents refused
vitamin K.  At 6 weeks, the baby was in intensive care.  The prognosis
for normal development is virtually zip, though I don't know what
happened to him in the long run.  Just one case?  Well, okay, but a
preventable tragedy. Actually I am aware of one other.

Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2