Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 15 May 1998 08:18:35 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I still think it better to give the vitamin K intramuscularly. I have
not heard of breast refusal after oral vitamin K, but we do not use
oral vitamin K here in Toronto. They do in Halifax (Canada), but I
doubt they have more breast refusal than we do.
The question of IM vitamin K and leukemia is a red herring, unproved,
and really unlikely as far as I am concerned.
I have seen a baby bleed into his head, and it is terrible. A baby
born after a midwife delivery at home, non traumatic. Parents refused
vitamin K. At 6 weeks, the baby was in intensive care. The prognosis
for normal development is virtually zip, though I don't know what
happened to him in the long run. Just one case? Well, okay, but a
preventable tragedy. Actually I am aware of one other.
Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC
|
|
|