LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Thu, 14 May 1998 17:22:11 EDT
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Jan (Y) writes,

<< The pharmacist did call me the next day
 and was still adamant that the product was not to be used for such a purpose.
 Apparently, he has spread the word to his pharmacist buddies because I have
 had several additional calls from parents saying that pharmacists had told
 them that this was an inappropriate use of the product.  YIKES. >>

And Jan (B) who is STILL steamed about this sort of thing, is going to ask you
if there is any chance you can get the phramacist to give you ALL the
documentation that states it is DANGEROUS for bf babies to take br tissue into
the mouth that has had hydrogel dressing on it.

Gag.

Not only do we have to deal with PARENTS, and Ezzo afficianados (the "new"
edition of Babywise I & II is out -- beware -- it's dreadful, but the
dreadfulness is more subtle.  Please note that all their "studies" are
"convenience" studies.  how convenient!!), and recalcitrant health care
providers, but now it's clerks and pharmacists who are obviously NOT our
Frank, our Tom, or our Anne.

Sigh.

Jan Barger -- 16 days and counting.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2