Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 15 Feb 1998 09:23:27 +0000 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would like to suggest that if babies are fed formula, without added
iron (still 3mg/L), and are started on iron containing foods at about 4
months of age, they do *not* need iron enriched formula.
The *need* for iron enriched formula creates a *need* for formula to 9
months or a year. This is pure formula company hype, and as I mentioned
before, it is unfortunate that many well meaning (and breastfeeding
supportive) pediatricians have fallen for this. Furthermore, I would
emphasize that what *may be* true in the US, is not necessarily true in
the rest of the world. Remember, Lactnet is international.
Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC
|
|
|