LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:49:00 -0000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
Hannah Hunter <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
cc: Anne Merewood <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Anne,
I don't know about the US, but I've just read a paper published in the
British Dietetic Association's journal "Journal of Human Nutrition and
Dietetics" (vol.10, no.5, Oct.1997, pp.305-311) called "Maternal
employment: does it influence feeding practices during infancy?". (Earland,
J, Ibrahim, SO, Harpin, VA). I'll quote part of the abstract:
"Results: Employed mothers stopped breast-feeding (sic) earlier. This
difference became evident after two months of age and reached significance
at four months (p less than 0.05). Employed mothers introduced foods
earlier and relied more on commercial baby foods, with significantly more
spending over £7-10 per week at the time of the survey (p less than 0.05)."
(In the text the authors say there were no significant differences between
the study group and the control group in terms of initial breast-feeding
rates). "Conclusions: Maternal employment does influence infant feeding
practices and consequences may have repercussions on future health. Further
studies are needed etc etc"
Best wishes
Hannah
(midwife and National Childbirth Trust breastfeeding counsellor, UK)
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2