Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LACTNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LACTNET Home LACTNET Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Feb 1998 21:07:46 +0000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
parvovirus
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
newman <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
cc: "Beverly Taylor, BSN, RNC, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Ask the question: why would breastfeeding be contraindicated?
Parvovirus does not, as far as I remember, have a chronic carrier state.
The baby, to have developed a large liver and all, must have been
infected quite some time ago.  Are again looking at "virus load"?  I
don't go for it.  I would imagine the mother is safe even if she had
parvovirus in her milk, which seems extremely unlikely.

Whenever someone suggests that breastfeeding is contraindicated, *they*
have to come up with the references to support their assertitions.

Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV