LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
leibovich Haim <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Dec 1997 12:18:04 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>Subject: Re: Retained placental fragments and delayed lactogenesis
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> The midwife is sure that
>>the placenta was delivered intact BUT it doesn't matter because retained
>>fragments "do not present as delayed lactation".  I have been reading
>>Lactnet and Ruth Lawrence etc. and * I* know that the midwife needs a
>>little bit more education.
>
>Is this knowledge so guarded that only LLLLs and LCs and a few select MDs
>know about it?

I'm sorry to say that *I* didn't know about retained placental fragments
and it's effect on lactation, and I am an MD with a special interest in
lactation, I do lactation consulting, I read a lot about lactation and so
on, but before joining lactnet I never heard about this. How do you
diagnose it? There is always something new to learn. Thank you all.

Mira Leibovich MD

ATOM RSS1 RSS2