LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Diane Wiessinger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Aug 1997 09:40:06 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
It's been a lumpy summer.  I wrote a month or so ago about a client with an
olive-sized, somewhat irregular lump.  Needle aspiration showed normal
tissue, but after consulting w/ 2 local drs and calling Ruth Lawrence, she
decided to have it removed.  Surgery was uneventful, incision drained some
during first day.

The next day she had chills and fever and, I believe, no further drainage.
Surgeon saw incision that day and felt it looked clean.  Within a week she
had a lump the size of a tennis ball that turned yellow when she used cold
on it.  It sounds as if the surgeon didn't see it again, because the
abscess (of course) ruptured spontaneously about a week after the original
surgery, to her *enormous* relief.  (It made me think of the exquisite
torture horses w/ abscessed hooves must experience - all that pressure
building but with nowhere to go.)  Now, three weeks after the original
surgery, the wound is still being packed daily by a home health nurse, but
"with 5 inches of packing now, instead of 3 feet."

The lump was classified as a) lactating adenoma, b) sclerosing adenoma, c)
fibrosis.  She continues to nurse her 1+ year old uneventfully.

Comments?  This was a woman who battled chronic oversupply and frequent
minor plugs and lumps during the early months.

Diane Wiessinger, MS, IBCLC, LLLL  Ithaca, NY

ATOM RSS1 RSS2