LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Aug 1997 15:32:21 +0000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
From:
Ros Escott <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
Authenticated sender is <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
> It is no coincidence that bottle nipples are shaped the way they are
> <duh>- they are not square, triangular, diamond-shaped, or rectangular
> for a REASON!  They are shaped like a human nipple...

I object.  To my eye, and to a baby who feeds from one, any similarity
between a rubber teat (nipple) and a breast is purely coincidental.  The
companies would like us to think they are a close approximation, but they
are not. I too find artificial teats offensive, but mainly because I know
the damage they can do to suck, the mouth, etc., not because they remind
me of nipples.

As for bottle teats in flowers for new mothers - that's a new one on me.
Do the florists also do a line on dildos in wedding flowers - just in
case they new couple don't fancy the natural thing, or in case something
doesn't work out......?  Same logic.

Ros Escott BAppSc IBCLC
Tasmania, Australia
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2