Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 17 Sep 1997 11:13:17 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Message text written by Lactation Information and Discussion
>Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 21:29:46 -0600
From: Sulman Family <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: "Motherguilt"
I came across a book at a University Bookstore tent sale the other day and
was aghast at what I read when I flipped through it. Not wanting to buy
it, I checked it out of the library. The book is "Motherguilt: How Our
Culture Blames Mothers for What's Wrong with Society," by Diane Eyer, PhD,
(also author of "Mother-Infant Bonding: a Scientific Fiction"). New York:
Random House, 1996.
Dr. Eyer is not a mother herself, but here is some of what she has to say
in a section called "The Breast-Feeding Police":
...Although the psychopediatric community now claims breast is
best,
the health advantages do not seem dramatic. Entire generations
have
been raised safely on formula. <
Whoa! I had to stop right there and comment. In the May 1997 LLLI
Breastfeeding Abstracts, Dr. Jack Newman's feature article, "When
Breastfeeding is Not Contraindicated" stated: "The fact that many millions
of babies have grown up in presumably good health without ever tasting
their mother's milk is a tribute to the amazing adaptability of the human
being, but it is not an argument for considering breastfeeding and
artificial feeding as equal or formula as without risk."
I have already had to use this quote at least five times in conversations I
have had with "disbelievers."
Thank you, Dr. Newman, for writing such a thought provoking article.
Susan Condon, BA, CLC, San Francisco
|
|
|