LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Hafner-Eaton <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jun 1997 16:39:25 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
 Patricia:  I don't think your example was too convoluted.  It makes the
point to me very clearly.  When my students think I'm being too hard on the
health care inequities for women, I usually reverse the situation we're
dealing with and substitute men/males and their respective body parts.
Yes, it sounds hysterical, but it also makes the point.  "While we're 'in
there anyway for an appendectomy/cholescystectomy/ovarian cyst/etc' let's
just remove that uterus.  You don't need it any more and it's just going to
develop cancer."   (Or, in the case of a hysterectomy, rationalizing the
removal of ovaries)  One of my favorites is to say, "You don't need those
testicles anymore. Let's just remove them so they don't get cancer."
Shocking?  Well, timid I am not.  I really hope they don't come down on you
for this.  It sounds like they're looking for a scapegoat.

: )Chris Hafner-Eaton, PhD, MPH, CHES, IBCLC  email: [log in to unmask]   : )
: )HSR & Health Educational Consultant        voice/fax: 541 753 7340    : )
: )LLLLLLLLLLLLL**CHANGE THE WORLD, NURTURE A CHILD!**LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL : )

ATOM RSS1 RSS2