LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Frances Coulter Sturgess, RD, MPH" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Mar 1997 19:21:00 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
FROM: Sturgess, Frances Coulter
TO:[log in to unmask]
SUBJECT: human milk fortifiers
DATE: 03-18-97   19:08 EST
PRIORITY:


Was a thread on this recently--could search under my name (Sturgess) iin
Lactnet--Nutrition and the MD (newsletter/abstracts) discussed human milk
fortif. in Jan 97 issue, referring to an article in the AM J of Clinical
Nutrition64:142,1996, concluding that "human milk fortifiers can improve short
term growth but  benefiicial effects on long-term development remain unproven
and surprising safety questions emerged."   (infections, higher blood chem
levels)

When i posted, Dr. Newman's comment on short term growth I think was that we
do not even know that growth rates outside the uterus should match growth
inside, I suppose given the variability of babies in general and the risks
mentioned above, so it may not be the best indicator of the babies health and
development.

Hope this helps

ATOM RSS1 RSS2