LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Liz Flight <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Feb 1997 17:20:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
In a message dated 97-02-10 19:11:57 EST, you write:

 As per the anesthesiologist who suggests that low back pain does not occur
 subsequent to epidural anesthetic.  Having just reviewed this subject,
 every
 single textbook in the field suggests that low back pain is a common,
 inexplicable, side effect of epidural anesthetics.  Some recover
rapidly(10-14
 days),  others much slower.

 Regards
 Tom Hale >>

THANKYOU Dr Hale!!!    Perhaps in other uses the pain may be considered
inexplicable, (although I think a needle piercing through sensitive lower
back ligaments is enough of a "reason" ), however, in the case of a laboring
woman I believe the residual pain is directly related to attendants lifting
mom's legs unevenly and/or  hyperflexing the thighs up "to the ears" during
the pushing stage.  This is a common variation on the lithotomy position used
to "open the pelvic outlet to the max diameters".  Even without an epidural,
some mom's have pain after this treatment. This position also leads to
unnecessary tears and/or episiotomies.  I'm looking forward to the "Mother
Friendly" Initiative to take hold!!!!!   Liz Flight in sunny, chilly
Jacksonville

ATOM RSS1 RSS2