LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"katherine a. dettwyler" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Nov 1996 08:49:46 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
>
>Dear Maureen,
>Thanks SO much for those two WONDERFUL long posts. I loved them! I too was
>feeling a little uncomfortable with the force of Kathy D.s statements, but
>confused as I love everything she writes. I wanted to believe that BF could
>be sensual/arousing, for the reasons you state.

Maureen and I do not disagree about the possibility of their being lovely,
sensual, even sexual feelings arising from breastfeeding.  My point was that
this is *learned* behavior, something we learn to expect and associate with
sex as part of our culture's belief that breasts are
intrinsically/biologically sexual organs, when there is no evidence that
breasts *are* intrinsically/biologically sexual organs.  Hey folks, my
breasts give me just as much pleasure during sex as anyone elses.  I still
think the evidence overwhelmingly points to this being culturally learned,
not part of our intrinsic biology.  That's all.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Katherine A. Dettwyler, Ph.D.                         email: [log in to unmask]
Anthropology Department                               phone: (409) 845-5256
Texas A&M University                                    fax: (409) 845-4070
College Station, TX  77843-4352

ATOM RSS1 RSS2