Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 16 Oct 1996 08:53:03 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Carol wrote:
I need ammunition. Got into a "discussion" with one of our anesthesiology
residents the other day. He was on "break" & didn't want to start an
epidural on a laboring mom. His order (knowing I'm an LC): "give her some
Stadol, maybe she won't need the epidural, & she won't have to worry if the
anesthesia messed up bf for her".
WOW -- I'd get his quote in writing, that he admits that anesthesia messes
up breastfeeding!!
Carol wrote also:
I responded (of course--never could resist a bait) that IMO Stadol did more
to screw up a baby's ability to suck than even a prolonged epidural. (I
won't go into my mini-tirade on the need to provide women with other
non-medical birthing supports!) Now I have to produce "research" to back up
my statement! Have there been any actual studies on Stadol and bf? And if
so, PLEASE e-mail them ASAP!
I can only offer my personal experience with two births with a little Stadol
that they made me absolutely bonkers -- one time I thought I was going to
die the moment the baby was born, the other time I was on another planet
being Spaceman Biff (a la Calvin and Hobbes) during the entire labor. BUT,
both children nursed just fine -- one for four years, the other for five years!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Katherine A. Dettwyler, Ph.D. email: [log in to unmask]
Anthropology Department phone: (409) 845-5256
Texas A&M University fax: (409) 845-4070
College Station, TX 77843-4352
|
|
|